Tuesday, May 12, 2009
NJASA and NJSBA Develop a Model Contract for Chief Education Officers
The New Jersey Association of School Administrators (NJASA) and the New Jersey School Boards Association (NJSBA) are jointly releasing a Model Superintendent Contract to guide school board members and school superintendents in negotiating employment provisions of contractual agreements.
A series of legislative bills signed into law in 2007 made a substantial impact on the content of administrators’ contracts. These laws required the New Jersey Department of Education to issue regulations which establish standards for superintendents’ contracts. The new NJASA and NJSBA Model Superintendent Contract complies with those laws and regulations and will assist school districts to meet their goal of financially and educationally sound agreements.
The Executive Superintendent of each county currently must review all school administrator contracts in accordance with guidelines published by the State Department of Education. In addition, state legislators have recently proposed several bills that would also affect school superintendent contracts, including one that would require the State Department of Education to develop a statewide model contract. NJSBA Executive Director Marie Bilik and I have offered the Commissioner of Education the model agreement for use as the state-endorsed template on behalf of both organizations.
NJASA and NJSBA believe that school boards and chief education officers have an obligation to develop fair, fiscally responsible agreements. According to NJSBA Executive Director Marie S. Bilik, “The goal of local boards of education is to attract and retain effective chief school administrators while preserving the community’s financial interests. The model contract will enable school boards to develop a compensation package that is reasonable for the community and is consistent with current requirements.”
NJASA continues to support full compliance with the law and complete public disclosure of contracts for all school district employees. The Association encourages Governor Corzine and state legislators to establish standards for all public employees comparable to those which now exist for school leaders.
Monday, May 4, 2009
NJASA to host Second Annual Northern Regional Superintendents' Summit
"Our progress as a nation can be no swifter than our progress in education. The human mind is our fundamental resource.”
-John F. Kennedy
The Northern Regional Leadership Summit is an opportunity for chief education officers and other NJASA members from central and northern New Jersey to come together to discuss the challenges they face in providing an enriching learning environment, effective leadership, as well as approaches and best practices to overcome those challenges.
This year’s event will be held on May 13, 2009 at Kean University in Union, New Jersey.
The NJASA has put together for this year’s Summit a roster of focus groups that will assist members in dealing with the following critical issues:
-Consolidation/Shared Services/Regionalization
-Professional Learning Communities
-Secondary School Redesign
-Legislative Advocacy
-Data Driven Decision-Making and Closing the Achievement Gap
Each focus group is design to allow members the opportunity to participate in an open and transparent dialogue with the presenter. At the Southern Regional Leadership Summit in April, conference goers were extremely active and enthusiastic about the candid conversation. I am confident the same will hold true for the May 13th event.
There is little argument that with each passing day new and more complex problems emerge in our school districts. This is why it is critical for you to attend this Summit so you can keep your finger on the pulse in learning about the best and most innovative resources that are available to you.
This is one Summit you do not want to miss.
For more information on the NJASA’s Northern Region Summit, please go to northernregionsummit.com
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
The NJASA Southern Region Leadership Summit
A Convocation of Educational Leaders
School leaders working in southern
The
· Legislative Advocacy;
· Consolidation/Shared Services/Regionalization;
· Secondary School Redesign;
· Professional Learning Communities; and
· Data Driven Decision-Making and Closing the Achievement Gap.
The presenters for each session then engaged their peers in discussion of the challenges to effective leadership, which they face, and also explored strategies and promising practices to meet those challenges.
I was pleased to see the enthusiasm and active involvement of the
I am pleased to see that our goal to provide a forum for communication among school leaders was so well received. We shall continue our work together to address the NJASA mission to ensure a superior statewide system of education by influencing and effecting educational policy, regulations, and legislation; and by maximizing the capacity and effectiveness of school leaders through professional development programs and support services.
I invite NJASA school leaders from the central and northern counties of our state to be present for a second regional Leadership Summit to be held at Kean University, Union, on May 13 and to enjoy the benefits of professional dialogue with your colleagues.
For More Information: www.njasa.net
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Shared Services, Consolidation and Administrative Costs - Separating Fact from Fiction
NJASA has recently sponsored several public forums on the topics of school consolidation and shared services. Many of the proponents of small schools and small school districts who attend the meetings seem to have stumbled upon the fact that many state officials refuse to acknowledge: Bigger is not always better! The advocates for local control of smaller, both in population and geography, rather than larger school systems, often cite the quality of the educational outcomes that they see for their children, the value received for their tax dollars, and the competitive cost for educating each student when compared to other districts.
Let’s examine data in one area that is often assumed to yield great savings – Administrative Costs.
1. The percentage of the budget dedicated to administrative costs for New Jersey school systems ranks near the bottom of the 50 states – 8th lowest in the nation – lower than many states which have larger school systems (see National Center for Educational Statistics data for fiscal year 2007).
Public School Administration Current Expenditures Percentage distribution National Average 10.8% New Jersey (tied for 8 9.5%
2. The average administrative cost per pupil for
Total Administration | |
District Type | Average Cost Per Pupil |
Statewide Average | $1,430 |
K-6 | $1,389 |
K-8 | $1,411 |
K-12 | $1,379 |
7-12/9-12 | $1,520 |
County Special Services Districts | $5,098 |
Vocational Districts | $2,167 |
Charter Schools | $2,163 |
3. Examining the available data for student enrollments and staffing for the period between the 1989/1990 and the 2005/2006 years reveals large increases in students, teachers and support staff while the number of administrators increased slightly (see NJ DOE Vital Statistics).
1989/90 – 2005/06 | ||
Full-Time Certificated Staff | Increase | |
Students | 317,777 | 29.5% |
Classroom Teachers | 35,659 | 47.2% |
Educational Support Services Personnel | 5,614 | 50.2% |
Administrators & Supervisors | 227 | 2.6% |
NJASA endorses the state’s effort to examine operational efficiencies through expanded shared services and possible consolidation of school systems. The examination must be a thoughtful and thorough one, however, and the quality of education must be carefully considered as a primary factor in each potential consolidation. The residents of communities that would be affected by these decisions deserve data that can assist their decisions, not assumptions born out of wishful thinking that bigger is better.
Thursday, April 2, 2009
NJASA Representative Assembly Offered All the Right Ingredients
In his opening remarks, NJASA President King commended the chief education officers on their accomplishments for moving education forward through their instructional leadership and the Association’s leadership for designing a Representative Assembly agenda with all the right ingredients.
These ingredients included: a 60-minute open dialogue with Education Commissioner Lucille Davy; an informative discussion of retirement-related issues with NJASA Pension Consultant Mort Reinhart; and an insightful exchange of ideas with Assembly Education Committee Chairman and NJ State Democratic Committee Chairman Joseph Cryan, (D-20, Union).
The dynamics of the Commissioner’s and Assemblyman’s presentation on school consolidation evoked various responses from the audience. Essentially, their remarks focused on the relationship of finances to school consolidation and did not address the academic concerns of maintaining and improving a quality public education for all New Jersey students.
Both Commissioner Davy and Assemblyman Cryan also acknowledged NJASA for its cooperation and willingness to work side-by-side with State legislators and Department of Education personnel by attending meetings, serving on committees, and providing valuable and well-researched testimony on a number of issues, such as the high school redesign initiative.
There are, however, occasions when NJASA positions differ with those of the New Jersey Department of Education and the State’s-elected leadership. In these instances, it is the responsibility of the chief education officer to lead the conversation with constituents to ensure that they are well-informed of opposing viewpoints.
Interaction at the local level is the foundation upon which the fate of statewide issues and initiatives can be cast. A significant example is that of Washington Twp., Gloucester County, where the chief education officer was able to address and forestall a legislative initiative for a pilot countywide school district. The voices of the more than 3,500 individuals were heard by their respective State-elected representatives.
There will be a number of significant topics identified as the Department of Education and its consultants move forward in the investigation of school consolidation. It is imperative that chief education officers working with their respective communities ask the hard questions about the Department’s recommendations to ensure that the members of their communities will be able to make informed and well-educated decisions as New Jersey education moves forward.
Monday, March 23, 2009
AASA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TRAVELS TO NJASA
Dr. Dan Domenech, Executive Director of the American Association of School Administrators (AASA), spoke to NJASA members at Trenton Headquarters on March 19, 2009 as part of NJASA’s Executive Leader Speaker Series. His topic, New President, New Congress, New Road for Education, was focused on federal legislation and upcoming funding. His thought- provoking, timely presentation coupled with his expertise, elicited much interaction among the group.
Domenech stated that Arne Duncan, new US Secretary of Education, was supportive of school administrators because he has allowed AASA a seat at the table for input and discussion of how the new federal Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Stimulus Fund for Schools can best be used. The previous administration did not include AASA and other educational organizations an opportunity to influence federal decision-making. While AASA is not supportive of every component of new educational initiatives promoted by the Obama Administration, Domenech is pleased to have an opportunity to be included in the decision-making process.
The AASA Executive Director spoke at length about the following:
· NCLB: has become the federal bill that has had the most significant impact on local education. The continued focus on reading and math, due to testing requirements, is having a negative impact on all other 21st century skills and knowledge. Because of the precedents that were set, the federal government is finding it difficult to extricate its involvement. The reauthorization of NCLB is not a focus of Congress and will not be reauthorized until at least next year. Nevertheless the heightened level of accountability, disaggregation of data, and the goal of leaving no child behind educationally, will continue.
· Title 1: Funded significantly in the stimulus package, went from 4 titles and 3 grants in 1965, to 11 titles and 93 programs and is a disjointed collection of unrelated programs and services begging for a consolidation and focus. However, this is the funding mechanism that Congress had to work with.
· AASA position is that all federal dollars and services should go to the total child and that poverty is the greatest single factor limiting student achievement.
· The Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Act was explored in depth by Dr. Domenech as he highlighted key points and reviewed timelines and limitations to using the funds appropriately.
For example, 50% of the new IDEA funds may be used to supplant current special education funding.
· There is a sense that emphasis in the future will be placed on the creation of national curriculum standards and in probability a national test.
Following the presentation, attendees had the opportunity to personally share ideas on how to best use the new funding and to interact with Dr. Domenech in regard to their plans.
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
New Jersey’s Budget Presents Tough Choices
On Tuesday, Governor Jon Corzine offered very little in the way of good news with his annual state budget message address. The Governor unveiled his $29.8 billion dollar budget with the education community being one of the few benefactors in his proposed FY 2010 Budget.
However, not all is lost in this year’s budget, the Governor is proposing a $25 million expansion in Pre-K education, and a $300 million increase in direct state aid for K-12 school districts. The NJASA is cautiously optimistic about the promise of municipal aid because dollar amounts have yet to be disclosed to the public and the budget still needs to go through the onerous legislative process.
Not much has changed from the Governor’s State-of-the-State address with his wanting to use the public pension system as a vehicle to control the state’s run-away expenses. This type of political maneuvering, initiated by past administrations, is nothing more than a near-sighted solution to a far-sighted problem and is a position the NJASA is strongly against.
We welcome the proposal of infusing federal monies from the stimulus package to stabilize education funding – a one-time solution that might prevent some harsh increases to school board budgets across our state. The NJASA eagerly waits for the state budget process to get underway and stands ready to assist our local elected officials with creating education policy that will help finally lead to a permanent solution to school funding.
The NJASA will continue to monitor the FY 2010 budget process and will advocate change where necessary until the Legislature develops the final appropriations acts.